
New York City has recovered all the jobs lost during the recession. Our state and local tax burden, as a share of city residents personal income, is among the highest in the U.S. The stock market is (overpriced at) close to its all time highs. Interest rates are at all time lows.
And yet we continue to face cuts in city services and/or tax increases. Even as the city borrows more, and engages in one shots. So drastic discount hotel san antonio measures are required because a one-shot was turned down? Wouldn t they have been required in a year when the one shot was used up anyway?
Norman Steisel is hilarious! It s great to see what a strong environmentalist he s become since the days when he killed Mayor Dinkins nascent recycling program in favor of trash incinerators, discount hotel san antonio made a bundle of money for Lazard in the process, discount hotel san antonio and then, immediately after inking the deal, quit his job in city government and went to work for Lazard.
I have a crazy idea about what to do with the abandoned underground trolley terminal: RUN TROLLEYS INTO IT. Or modern light rail, preferably, if it can be done. Or even buses, if they ll fit. It wouldn t be all that crazy to rejigger the Manhattan bus network to make that trolley terminal a very useful feeder for vast swaths discount hotel san antonio of Brooklyn that have seen their transit services cut back for decades. Probably close to half a million people could benefit discount hotel san antonio from restoring proper surface transit to their neighborhoods, and the only lose would be another playground (we have so few ) for yuppies with park priapism.
The way to save money on the Tappan discount hotel san antonio Zee would be to replace the current plan with a twin bore rail tunnel and/or just keep what we got. If we are going to build a new bridge, at the very least, the current structure could probably support discount hotel san antonio 2-3 tracks in each direction. The bridge Cuomo pushing is a bumblefcuk crusade to keep the Hudson Valley parochial. It makes neither environmental nor economic sense.
I think it s good that NYC is building bike lanes, but we re really doing it all wrong. All this nonsense where motorists and inept cops park in the lanes could be solved by making the lanes physically contiguous with the sidewalk. It might even help stem the babbling of IQ-of-80 advocates writing in to NYC tabloids about dangerous cyclists. Contiguity with the sidewalk is what they do with great success in Cologne, a rather auto-centric city by some measures. If pedestrians walk in the bike lane, they can expect to be yelled at.
Anyway, some of it is normative, but they just seem to have a system that is lightyears better, and contiguity with the sidewalk seems like a key component. A moron motorist can t see the space and go, hey, I m just re-appropriating road space.
I have to disagree with the Cologne style bike lanes. They were on and in the middle of sidewalks, bikes were going only slightly faster than the peds. While very few cars passed on the streets. (Besides being a thousand or so years older, Cologne is like Stamford or Darien, the land of bankers) I was amazed that the lanes were placed there, they seemed good for no one.
On that same trip I got to ride in and walk next to lanes alongside the sidewalks in Copenhagen. They were raised from the road way, and no ped dared step in them because everyone there respected the space allotted.
@twowheel:disqus : Usually the shoulder of the sidewalk facing the street in Cologne is reserved for parking (which is odd) and/or biking. This is probably the reason for the impression that they re in the middle of sidewalks. discount hotel san antonio It s true, but they re on the edge of the part of the sidewalk useful discount hotel san antonio to pedestrians. My only complaint about Cologne is that they aren t very well-delineated, but it doesn t seem to stop them from being used and respected. The contiguity feature makes them worlds safer.
No comments:
Post a Comment